Share on Facebook 274 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Devotionals   

Liberty Counsel -- Using Battered Women and Starving Children to Defend Heresy and Lawlessness

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages)   1 comment

This is very deceptive what the Liberty Counsel is trying to do here. Rodney Howard-Browne was not arrested for violating an order not to feed people. He held a church service where he "preached" about the evil government, how the virus was a "phantom virus", and blamed it on Bill Gates. Now, let's be reasonable here. Is the Liberty Counsel and Browne honestly suggesting that the only way to feed people is to hold the church service? Please. I know plenty of churches that are not holding service yet still serving their community within the community guidelines. So save the martyr nonsense about starving children. No one is buying it.

"Many people are experiencing increased stress. Many have lost their jobs and do not know where they will get the next meal. Many people suffer from mental, emotional and physical pain. Those with intractable physical pain are not able to get relief from their chiropractor, physical therapist or pain management specialist. Experiencing pain 24/7 often leads to depression and even suicide. Battered women are locked in their homes with the abuser. Children are out of school and are restricted in some places from going to the parks or beaches. Without work, the extra stress can become overwhelming. Some churches provide counseling. Some provide food, clothes and money to those in need." -- Liberty Counsel

Yet all of those things can be provided safely, without breaking the law, and do not require the church to hold Sunday service. We see right through this sham. Browne is wrong, period. So the liberty Counsel is trying to rehabilitate his image by pretending this was really about helping battered women, feeding the poor and suicide prevention. Nonsense. This was about a mega church pastor wanting to feed his ego and spew political conspiracy theories from the pulpit.

"The River Church serves a large community that has no access to the internet. Even some people who have access to the internet lack the bandwidth to watch a service online. To answer the question of whether a church is essential and whether it should open or close its doors, people need to look beyond their own circumstances to see the mounting needs and hurting people who are less fortunate and who need the ministry of the local church." -- Liberty Counsel

C'mon. The River Church is in Tampa bay Florida, not the remote areas of Tajikistan. Last time I checked, Tampa Bay has internet access. Are there some who may not have access? I suppose but if Howard-Browne wanted to really be magnanimous he would get his congregants some Wi-Fi and stop using them to defend his indefensible behavior. Only God knows how many people Rodney Howard-Browne infected in this service and how many will die as a result.

"No shepherd of the flock wants to do anything that would endanger the community. But the question is, should we allow some discretion to follow health guidelines while determining what can and cannot be provided online? Or do we want to give this unfettered authority to a single government official?" -- Liberty Counsel

Hmmm, that sounds like a question you ask BEFORE you decide to break the law. Asking it after only makes you look like you are trying to excuse the fact that you broke the law. Let's examine the question though. Should we allow discretion on public health matters that could affect the lives permanently of untold numbers of people to someone who knows nothing about epidemiology, disease, viruses or public health? I am going to go with "no." This action was ordered by a single person but the Sherriff acted based on the medical advice of professionals in the health care arena. I cannot believe the sheer idiocy of this question. Do you want Rodney Howard-Browne deciding maters of public health? Dear Lord.

'Perhaps it is important to reconsider what is essential about the church. Some are far more essential than others. A blanket answer to the question is too simple and serves a grave injustice to many. Maybe there should be more discretion given to the shepherds of the church to determine whether the church should meet, and if so, how best may the church protect those who attend and serve the needs of the community. This is a much better approach than a one-size-fits-all template that labels churches as "non-essential."' -- Liberty Counsel

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Rate It | View Ratings

Anthony Wade Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Credentialed Minister of the Gospel for the Assemblies of God. Owner and founder of 828 ministries. Vice President for Goodwill Industries. Always remember that in all things God works for the good of those who love Him and are called according to (more...)
 
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Joel Osteen Blasphemes "I Am" (55072 views)

Why I Have Left the Assemblies of God (38990 views)

Joyce Meyer Teaching the "Relationship over Religion" Heresy (19896 views)

Joyce Meyer -- A Prisoner of Heresy (17580 views)

Francis Chan Stands With Outright Heresy, Again (14660 views)

Bethel Teaches to Declare God is in a Good Mood and Other Insanities (14340 views)

Total Views: 160538

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: