Share on Facebook 191 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing

NAR Experiential Christianity Says it is Time to do Away with Church

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages)   1 comment

Churches are on life support because they thought they could do it on their own. They usurped the role of God in thinking they had to grow their church when the bible makes it clear that only God decides who and how many get added to the number. Now let's be careful here and cut through the NAR double speak. Churches built on unbiblical traditions, as we see many in the Catholic Church for example, are not what McDaniels is speaking about. Experiential Christianity seeks to do away with church itself as it currently exists. Instead of scripturally based worship music he would replace it with the banal, droning, repetitive chants of today's "worship"; that seeks to glorify oneself and not God. Instead of telling God how great He is, we now tell God how much He loves us and that is a stark difference between worshipping God and worshipping self. Instead of the preeminence of scripture, he would replace it with eastern mysticism schemes like soaking and transcendental prayer. Here is today's deep theology. The church is not supposed to solve your problems on this earth. It is supposed to solve your eternal problem of going to hell. One of the benefits of being saved and having Christ is that you will more effectively deal with your carnal problems but that cannot be the motivational factor. We need a savior not a life coach. Even the disciples wanted Jesus to solve their temporal problems of Roman oppression but He came to deliver them from so much more. He came to deliver them from their sins and bondage to Satan. That is still what the Gospel seeks to do. The NAR would prefer to focus on this world because it worships this world. Our standing before God and eternal destination however, is what the business of the church is supposed to be about.

"What Can Church Leaders Do? Stop relying on yesterday. Refusing to change is a step toward death. Singing songs from 2,000 years ago is noble but irrelevant. Yes, they have meaning, and we should preserve them. But we can sing them with cultural relevance to this generation. And we do not need singers or song leaders with talent alone. We need modern-day psalmists with hearts to connect to God. These men and women do not just sing songs; they connect to God in worship. Their goal is to sing songs in the throne room and take others there with them. Our church members need a touch from God. A touch to get them through the week--a tangible moment where God's presence is real. No, not an emotion. But if God is near, our emotions will be unlocked. Emotions are not a sure sign of God's touch. But when Jesus touched people in the Scriptures, they displayed emotions. "One Sabbath day, as Jesus was teaching in a synagogue, he saw a woman who had been crippled by an evil spirit. She had been bent double for eighteen years and was unable to stand up straight. When Jesus saw her, he called her over and said, 'Dear woman, you are healed of your sickness!' Then he touched her, and instantly she could stand straight. How she praised God!" (Luke 13:10--13, NLT). Did you see it? She praised God. If you received your healing after 18 years, are you going to praise God? I think you would. Would churches accept this behavior today? Most wouldn't." -- Thomas McDaniels

Wow. Singing songs from 2000 years ago is irrelevant? Spoken like a carnal thinking, reprobate and deluded mind. Most of the alleged music today, coming out of Bethel, Hillsong and Elevation is absolute garbage to God. The date of the song is irrelevant -- only the biblical accuracy matters. This esoteric gobbledygook about singing in the throne room is at the heart of the problem with NAR experiential Christianity. We cannot go to throne room beloved. Yes, it is true that Paul was once taken there but the outlier in all of history is not what we base sound doctrine upon. Kim Walker-Smith is the worship leader for Jesus Culture from Bethel and she is firmly entrenched in this experiential mess. She tells of a waking visitation she had from Jesus who whisked her away to the throne room where she met the Father face to face. God ripped out a piece of His own heart to mold a miniature version of Walker-Smith to dance and sing for Him while He clapped maniacally. Seriously. This is her testimony she tells everyone, at every concert. Since we know from the bible that she could not have seen the Father face to face and live, we are left in assuming this was a demonic visitation with Satan's emissaries posing as angels of light and she could not tell the difference. That is what happens when you leave the "box" that is the surety of scripture in order to chase your personal experience. So get over yourself. You are not the Apostle Paul and will not be visiting the throne room any time soon. If we truly want to experience God then we need to read His word, not chase these fleeting emotional flings. As for accepting healing, I think most churches would welcome it. Yet the fake healings passed off by these rogue churches are transparent. If Todd White is so gifted a healer, why not ship him off to China right now and quell this coronavirus outbreak? If Bill Johnson truly fancied himself a healer, why isn't he camped out in the Redding California emergency room? I think we all know the answers to these questions.

"What Was the Bible's Response? But the leader in charge of the synagogue was indignant that Jesus had healed her on the Sabbath day. "There are six days of the week for working," he said to the crowd. "Come on, those days to be healed, not on the Sabbath." But the Lord replied, "You hypocrites! Each of you works on the Sabbath day! Don't you untie your ox or your donkey from its stall on the Sabbath and lead it out for water? This dear woman, a daughter of Abraham, has been held in bondage by Satan for eighteen years. Isn't it right that she be released, even on the Sabbath?" (Luke 13:14--16, NLT). Make note that we have progressed little. Jesus would say the same words to us today. Can you see it? Religion says God can't do that. Not today. Religion cannot handle what cannot explain. John Burton said, "The days of predictable, scheduled, ordered church services must come to an end. We have become so enamored with human order in the church that Holy Spirit, biblical order, is completely rejected."' -- Thomas McDaniels

John Burton is as compromised a NAR adherent as Thomas McDaniels is. This example is ridiculous. The point of the rebuke of the Pharisees was that they used the law without understanding the spirit of the law. They had no mercy. McDaniels wants to make a silly point here that they are somehow a "religious" spirit and the NAR position is the found in the role of Christ in this story. Just because Jesus healed on the Sabbath does not mean that God now wants to eliminate church. The point is beyond vacuously stupid. Listen, I agree that overly formal church services that do not allow for a move of the spirit is not the design found in scripture but to abandon all of it and replace it with the emotional whims of man, deluded into thinking something spiritual is occurring is madness. God is not a God of disorder. Burton and his like have written extensively about church services wildly out of control like we saw in the Toronto demonic outpouring or the Brownsville debacle. No thanks, I think we should stick with what God has already written and stop pretending that it is somehow outdated for this generation. The sheer arrogance of that thinking is staggering.

"God Desires to Do More. God is alive and has never been dead. Do our churches resemble that truth? Jesus was in a tomb. A borrowed one. Jesus only needed that tomb for three days. And on the third day, He rose. And He is alive. Just like Jesus told others to loose Lazarus and let him go, it's time the church loose God and let Him out of the box. Because ... "Now to him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us" (Eph. 3:20)." -- Thomas McDaniels

Huh? Is this incoherent rambling supposed to be some new form of eisegesis? Any church that preaches the Gospel is very much alive because only the Gospel brings life to what is dead. We do not need to be rolling around on the floor shouting "shabba!" We do not need to be barking like dogs or twitching uncontrollably to know that we have had church. That is not experiencing God. It is experiencing the devil. These are very dangerous teachings that are deceiving generations. My experience is based upon my flesh and it counts for nothing. The word of God however is eternal and it is life. Give me that.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Rate It | View Ratings

Anthony Wade Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Credentialed Minister of the Gospel for the Assemblies of God. Owner and founder of 828 ministries. Vice President for Goodwill Industries. Always remember that in all things God works for the good of those who love Him and are called according to (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Joel Osteen Blasphemes "I Am" (55051 views)

Why I Have Left the Assemblies of God (38947 views)

Joyce Meyer Teaching the "Relationship over Religion" Heresy (19867 views)

Joyce Meyer -- A Prisoner of Heresy (17558 views)

Francis Chan Stands With Outright Heresy, Again (14627 views)

Bethel Teaches to Declare God is in a Good Mood and Other Insanities (14319 views)

Total Views: 160369

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: